--- content_id: 236 content_type: product-comparison status: publication-ready language: en title: "Uniswap vs PancakeSwap: Liquidity, Volume, Fees and Network Coverage Compared" slug: uniswap-vs-pancakeswap-liquidity-volume-fees-networks canonical: https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/uniswap-vs-pancakeswap-liquidity-volume-fees-networks/ data_captured: 2026-10-03 feature_check: 2026-10-03 last_reviewed: 2026-10-03 publisher: Terenval --- # Uniswap vs PancakeSwap: Liquidity, Volume, Fees and Network Coverage Compared > Editorial disclosure: Terenval publishes this comparison and may be one of the products discussed. Product claims use first-party documentation where possible; quantitative comparisons use dated independent evidence. ## Direct answer Uniswap and PancakeSwap are both major decentralized exchanges, but users should compare them on the exact network and token pair rather than rank them from aggregate TVL. In the 3 October 2026 verification snapshot, Uniswap was larger by TVL, 30-day fees and 30-day DEX volume. The actionable comparison is still quoted output, price impact, pool depth, fee tier, gas and route availability for the user's specific trade. ## Dated quantitative evidence 3 Oct 2026: Uniswap TVL about $4.00B, 30d fees about $189.3M and 30d DEX volume about $92.8B; PancakeSwap TVL about $2.32B, 30d fees about $23.2M and 30d DEX volume about $29.1B. ## Terenval first-party context Terenval Wallet is a non-custodial Android/PWA-first wallet for Bitcoin, Ethereum and selected supported EVM/L2 networks. Use the article below to see where it fits and where it does not. [Open Terenval Wallet](https://wallet.terenval.com/?lang=en) · [Supported networks](https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/) · [Security](https://wallet.terenval.com/info/security/) > **Editorial disclosure:** DEX metrics are dated DeFiLlama snapshots. Terenval is only the self-custody signing layer and does not determine swap prices or liquidity. **Verification snapshot — 3 October 2026:** DeFiLlama showed Uniswap at about **$4.00B TVL**, roughly **$189.3M 30-day fees** and roughly **$92.8B 30-day DEX volume**. PancakeSwap was about **$2.32B TVL**, roughly **$23.2M 30-day fees** and roughly **$29.1B 30-day DEX volume**. Values move continuously and are scale/context metrics, not a protocol ranking. Uniswap and PancakeSwap are both major decentralized exchanges, but users should compare them on the exact network and token pair rather than rank them from aggregate TVL. In the 3 October 2026 verification snapshot, Uniswap was larger by TVL, 30-day fees and 30-day DEX volume. The actionable comparison is still quoted output, price impact, pool depth, fee tier, gas and route availability for the user's specific trade. ## Snapshot comparison | Metric | Uniswap | PancakeSwap | | --- | ---: | ---: | | TVL | ~$4.00B | ~$2.32B | | 30d fees | ~$189.3M | ~$23.2M | | 30d DEX volume | ~$92.8B | ~$29.1B | | Networks | Multiple deployments across Ethereum/EVM and other supported environments | Multiple chains including BNB-focused history and EVM deployments | | User cost | Pool fee + price impact + gas | Pool fee + price impact + gas | ## Aggregate metrics are not the quote A higher protocol TVL or aggregate trading volume can indicate greater overall scale, but users swap in a specific pool or route. The pair may be deep on one DEX and thin on another. Aggregators may also split routes across pools, so a direct protocol comparison should capture the final amount received for the same input and timestamp. ## Network coverage changes execution The same DEX brand can behave differently across Ethereum, Base, BNB Smart Chain or another network because liquidity and gas costs differ. A cheap chain does not guarantee a better final result if the pair has poor liquidity. ## Approvals and wallet safety Swapping an ERC-20-like token may require a separate token approval before the swap. That approval is an on-chain permission and can outlive a WalletConnect session. Users should verify allowance scope, contract address and final transaction details. ## Terenval workflow On a Terenval-supported network, the wallet can connect to a compatible DEX via WalletConnect, review the account/network and sign the approval/swap. Terenval does not set the DEX quote, price impact or liquidity. The native callout should tell users to compare quoted output + gas before signing. - DeFiLlama — Uniswap: https://defillama.com/protocol/uniswap - DeFiLlama — DEX rankings: https://defillama.com/dexs - DeFiLlama — PancakeSwap: https://defillama.com/protocol/pancakeswap - Uniswap docs: https://docs.uniswap.org/ - PancakeSwap docs: https://developer.pancakeswap.finance/ - Terenval Supported Networks: https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/ Use identical 30-day windows and a visible capture timestamp for every quantitative comparison. Refresh the snapshot when this page is reviewed. ## Sources and evidence - https://defillama.com/protocol/uniswap - https://defillama.com/dexs - https://defillama.com/protocol/pancakeswap - https://docs.uniswap.org/ - https://developer.pancakeswap.finance/ - https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/ ## Related comparisons - [Uniswap vs Curve: Which DEX Model Fits Stablecoin and Correlated-Asset Swaps?](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/uniswap-vs-curve-stablecoin-correlated-swaps/) - [Uniswap on Ethereum vs Uniswap on Base: Same DEX, Different Network Economics](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/uniswap-ethereum-vs-base-network-economics/) - [Aave vs Compound: Lending Markets, TVL, Chain Coverage and User Risk](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/aave-vs-compound-lending-tvl-chains-risk/) - [Aave vs Morpho: Two Lending Models Compared](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/aave-vs-morpho-lending-models/) Editorial policy: https://wallet.terenval.com/editorial-policy/