--- content_id: 212 content_type: product-comparison status: publication-ready language: en title: "Bitcoin + EVM in One Wallet: MetaMask vs Trust Wallet vs Terenval" slug: bitcoin-evm-one-wallet-metamask-trust-terenval canonical: https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/bitcoin-evm-one-wallet-metamask-trust-terenval/ data_captured: 2026-10-02 feature_check: 2026-10-03 last_reviewed: 2026-10-03 publisher: Terenval --- # Bitcoin + EVM in One Wallet: MetaMask vs Trust Wallet vs Terenval > Editorial disclosure: Terenval publishes this comparison and may be one of the products discussed. Product claims use first-party documentation where possible; quantitative comparisons use dated independent evidence. ## Direct answer MetaMask, Trust Wallet and Terenval can all cover native Bitcoin plus EVM use, but their scopes differ. MetaMask now documents native Bitcoin alongside its EVM ecosystem. Trust Wallet supports Bitcoin within a 100+ blockchain catalog. Terenval explicitly combines Bitcoin with Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain and selected L2/EVM networks. The important question is not whether a wallet says “multichain,” but whether its Bitcoin derivation, EVM network set and recovery behavior match the user's actual accounts. ## Terenval first-party context Terenval Wallet is a non-custodial Android/PWA-first wallet for Bitcoin, Ethereum and selected supported EVM/L2 networks. Use the article below to see where it fits and where it does not. [Open Terenval Wallet](https://wallet.terenval.com/?lang=en) · [Supported networks](https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/) · [Security](https://wallet.terenval.com/info/security/) > **Editorial disclosure:** Terenval is a compared first-party product. The article uses the same network/recovery criteria for every wallet and does not declare a universal winner. MetaMask, Trust Wallet and Terenval can all cover native Bitcoin plus EVM use, but their scopes differ. MetaMask now documents native Bitcoin alongside its EVM ecosystem. Trust Wallet supports Bitcoin within a 100+ blockchain catalog. Terenval explicitly combines Bitcoin with Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain and selected L2/EVM networks. The important question is not whether a wallet says “multichain,” but whether its Bitcoin derivation, EVM network set and recovery behavior match the user's actual accounts. ## What “one wallet” does not mean One interface does not merge Bitcoin and EVM into one blockchain. Bitcoin uses UTXOs and Bitcoin-specific address formats. Ethereum-compatible chains use account-based state and commonly use `0x` addresses. A wallet can derive keys for both from one recovery source while still keeping balances and transaction rules separate. | Criterion | MetaMask | Trust Wallet | Terenval | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Native BTC | Yes, current documentation | Yes | Yes | | Ethereum/EVM | Broad | Broad | Selected built-in list | | Network breadth | Expanded multichain + custom EVM | 100+ blockchains advertised | Focused BTC + EVM/L2 set | | Migration issue to test | Bitcoin account/derivation + EVM account discovery | Bitcoin/EVM account discovery across broad asset set | Expected BTC/EVM public addresses after import | ## Recovery compatibility deserves a test A phrase accepted by all three wallets does not guarantee the same visible account set. Wallets can differ in Bitcoin address type, derivation path, account index and discovery logic. Before using a migration as proof of recovery, compare the expected public addresses and test with small values. MetaMask's Bitcoin help currently documents native Bitcoin and Native SegWit behavior. Trust Wallet and Terenval should likewise be evaluated through the addresses they actually derive for the user's recovery setup rather than assumptions from brand labels. ## EVM network separation The same EVM address can appear on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Smart Chain or other chains, but funds are network-specific. The user must select the correct chain and have the required native gas asset there. A multichain wallet can make this easier to visualize; it cannot merge network state. ## Where Terenval fits Terenval's published production set—Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Optimism, Arbitrum One, Base, Polygon, ZKsync Era, Linea and Scroll—is directly relevant to users who want that specific combination. Trust Wallet is much broader; MetaMask offers broader EVM/custom-network flexibility and newer Bitcoin support. The right fit follows the user's chain list and preferred workflow. - MetaMask Bitcoin: https://support.metamask.io/configure/networks/bitcoin/ - MetaMask Networks: https://support.metamask.io/configure/networks/how-to-add-a-custom-network-rpc/ - Trust Wallet: https://trustwallet.com/ - Terenval Supported Networks: https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/ Re-test recovery/address behavior when wallet implementations change. Do not promise universal cross-wallet derivation compatibility. ## Sources and evidence - https://support.metamask.io/configure/networks/bitcoin/ - https://support.metamask.io/configure/networks/how-to-add-a-custom-network-rpc/ - https://trustwallet.com/ - https://wallet.terenval.com/info/supported-networks/ ## Related comparisons - [Best Android Crypto Wallet Setup for Bitcoin + Ethereum + L2: MetaMask vs Trust vs Terenval](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/android-crypto-wallet-bitcoin-ethereum-l2-metamask-trust-terenval/) - [Browser Extension vs PWA/Mobile Crypto Wallet: MetaMask and Rabby vs Terenval](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/browser-extension-vs-pwa-mobile-metamask-rabby-terenval/) - [Rabby vs MetaMask vs Terenval: Which Wallet Model Fits DeFi on EVM?](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/rabby-vs-metamask-vs-terenval-defi-evm/) - [WalletConnect on Mobile: Terenval vs Trust Wallet vs MetaMask](https://wallet.terenval.com/comparisons/walletconnect-mobile-terenval-trust-metamask/) Editorial policy: https://wallet.terenval.com/editorial-policy/